Five paragraph essay rubrics

The essay should have good grammar and show the right level of vocabulary. It should be organized, and the content should be appropriate and effective. Teachers also look at the overall effectiveness of the piece.

Essay and Presentation Rubric - Science NetLinks

When evaluating specific writing samples, you may also want to include other criteria for the essay based on material you have covered in class. You may choose to grade on the type of essay they have written and whether your students have followed the specific direction you gave. You may want to evaluate their use of information and whether they correctly presented the content material you taught.

For our example, we will use grammar, organization and overall effect to create a rubric. The most straightforward evaluation uses a four-point scale for each of the criteria. Taking the criteria one at a time, articulate what your expectations are for an A paper , a B paper and so on. A B paper would have some mistakes but use generally good grammar.

A C paper would show frequent grammatical errors.

A D paper would show that the student did not have the grammatical knowledge appropriate for his language learning level. Taking these definitions, we now put them into the rubric. The next step is to take each of the other criteria and define success for each of those, assigning a value to A, B, C and D papers.

Synthesis Sample Essay and Rubric Examination

Those definitions then go into the rubric in the appropriate locations to complete the chart. Each of the criteria will score points for the essay. Logic may often fail, or the argument may often be unclear. May not address counter-arguments or make any connections with the thesis.


  1. prologue to the canterbury tales essays.
  2. Paola Brown Student Learning Tools.
  3. essay on miracles david hume.
  4. watership down critical essays.

May also contain logical contradictions. Ideas do not flow at all, usually because there is no argument to support. Simplistic view of topic, and there is no effort to grasp possible alternative views. Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument.

Interview reflective essay rubric

Too incoherent to determine. Language is clearly organized. Correct word usage, punctuation, sentence structure, and grammar; correct citation of sources; minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences or comma splices.

You are here

Sentence structure and grammar strong despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some spelling errors and at least one run-on sentence, sentence fragment, or comma splice. Minor problems in sentence structure and grammar.

Multiple errors in punctuation, citation style, and spelling. May have several two to five run-on sentences, sentence fragments, and comma splices. Huge problems in sentence structure and grammar. Frequent major errors in citation style, punctuation, and spelling. May have many more than five run-on sentences, sentence fragments, and comma splices. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems in mechanics.


  1. summer legal internship cover letter?
  2. essay writing courses nsw.
  3. The Five-Paragraph Theme - National Writing Project!
  4. a passage to india thesis.
  5. mla format essay word count.
  6. essayist who wrote a chapter on ears?
  7. common sense definition essay.

All source material is used and smoothly integrated into the text. All sources are relevant and reliable. All source material is used. All sources are accurately documented, but a few are not in the desired format on the Works Cited page. Most sources are relevant and reliable. All sources are accurately documented, but many are not in the desired format on the Works Cited page.

iRubric: Five Paragraph Informative Essay Rubric

Some sources are relevant and reliable. Incorrect format is used. Sources are not relevant nor reliable. Back to Student Learning Tools. Introductory paragraph contains some background information and states the problem, but does not explain using details. States the thesis of the paper. Introduction states the thesis but does not adequately explain the background of the problem.